Technological innovation doesn’t always yield good results.
Even as electronic devices are championed as the best means of learning for youth — with a massive price tag — we aren’t seeing dramatic improvements in students’ performance.
On Feb. 23, Techspot published an article citing the beginning of the tech takeover in the classroom under former Maine Democratic Gov. Angus King.
In 2002, King created a program to put Apple laptops in middle schoolers’ repertoire. By 2024, the federal government had used a staggering $30 billion to follow his state’s plan, getting tablets and laptops to students across the country.
This seemed like an obvious shift in the right direction on paper: The world is becoming more technological. Students will use these devices in the workplace, so why not familiarize them now?
But neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath laid out the adverse impacts of this decision to the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
According to Horvath, Gen Z is the first cohort to see declining test scores compared to their predecessors. He found an inverse relationship between academic performance and time using digital devices.
“This is not a debate about rejecting technology,” he told lawmakers. “It is a question of aligning educational tools with how human learning actually works. Evidence indicates that indiscriminate digital expansion has weakened learning environments rather than strengthened them.”
Techspot cited studies showing 3,000 university students spent two-thirds of time on their school laptops engaging in material unrelated to classwork.
Fortune found that in 2017, test scores weren’t improving after King’s program.
A study published in OxJournal made a worrying conclusion regarding technology and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
The research “established an evident correlation between digital media use and the prevalence of ADHD in contemporary society. This applies for all age demographics, depending on the setting, such as being in school or in a workplace.”
“The earlier we immerse our children’s underdeveloped minds in digital media, offering them instant fulfillment, the higher the likelihood that an attention-deficit disorder will emerge as they mature,” the study continued.
“This inhibits individuals from focusing their selective attention on a particular task, as well as reduces their divided and sustained attention.”
A traditionally minded educator — or most conservatives — could have seen this coming.
Laptops were introduced as cutting-edge tools to help students prepare for the future.
The traditional means of learning — call it pencil and paper, a chalkboard, or even parchment and quill — were used for so long for a reason.
These were — and in many cases still are — the most effective means of grasping classroom material.
Culturally, the norm is innovation and progress for the sake of it.
If something can change, it should.
But that change may not always be for the best.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
The post Brutal Numbers: Schools Spent $30 Billion on Laptops… and They Seem to Have Made Kids Dumber appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.