President Trump’s description of Chicago as a war zone is grounded in stark data showing that more Americans were killed there than in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. Between 2001 and 2016, the city recorded 8,229 homicides, surpassing total U.S. military deaths from Afghanistan (2,459 service members and 1,822 contractors) and Iraq (4,518 service members and 281 contractors), which together amounted to roughly 8,799 fatalities.
Even from 2016 to 2020, another 3,276 people were killed in Chicago. In the city’s most violent neighborhoods, such as Garfield Park, young men faced an annual firearm homicide rate of 1,277 per 100,000 in 2021–2022, more than triple the 395 per 100,000 risk faced by U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan.
Chicago, a self-declared sanctuary city, has deepened its crisis by refusing to enforce federal immigration law. Illinois is home to an estimated 511,000 undocumented immigrants, including about 183,000 in Chicago, roughly seven percent of the city’s population. Another 125,000 live in suburban Cook County and 151,000 in the surrounding collar counties. Between 2021 and 2023, Illinois’s unauthorized immigrant population grew by more than 75,000, one of the largest increases in the nation.
Despite this surge, state and city leaders have ordered police not to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. At the same time, federal agents are facing escalating violence from protesters who block roads, surround ICE vehicles, throw rocks, and physically assault officers.
The Broadview Processing Center outside Chicago has become a hotspot for these confrontations. In one incident, ICE agents were boxed in by ten cars during a patrol, forcing them to abandon a damaged vehicle. More than 200 rioters later blocked the facility’s gates, and one was caught carrying a firearm. In another case, a woman was shot after allegedly trying to run down agents when they were surrounded.
Federal authorities warn that these attacks mirror a broader national trend of rising violence against immigration enforcement, with extremists in several states launching coordinated assaults on ICE personnel since June 2025.
These assaults are clear violations of federal, state, and local law, yet Illinois leaders continue to prohibit law enforcement from intervening. By doing so, they have failed to uphold their duty to protect public safety and the rule of law. This refusal to act, combined with the harboring of illegal immigrants and failure to protect federal officers, is why President Trump declared that Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson “should be in jail.”
President Donald Trump escalated his confrontation with Illinois leaders this week, declaring that Governor JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson “should be in jail” for failing to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials. His comments came as the administration deployed Texas and Illinois National Guard troops to the Chicago area, part of a wider federal initiative to combat crime and enforce immigration law. The move drew sharp opposition from local officials and signaled one of the most direct showdowns yet between the White House and Democratic-run cities.
Governor Pritzker denounced the remarks as authoritarian and vowed to resist the deployment through every legal means available. “If you come for my people, you come through me,” he said at a press conference, accusing the president of intimidation. He urged residents to record federal actions on their phones to provide evidence for potential court challenges.
Mayor Johnson also condemned the president’s threats, saying, “This is not the first time Trump has tried to have a Black man unjustly arrested,” and pledged that he would not back down. Both leaders described the deployment as an “authoritarian march” against Democratic strongholds. Earlier in the week, Illinois filed suit to block the operation, citing past court rulings that limited similar federal interventions in Portland, Oregon.
Mayor Johnson failed to explain when he mistakenly believes that President Trump had previously “tried to have a Black man unjustly arrested.” Also, since the mayor is violating the terms of his office by failing to protect the public and is openly harboring criminals wanted on federal charges, then arresting him for a crime would be justified.
It is also both worrying and telling that the governor and mayor call ICE enforcement an “authoritarian march,” as immigration laws already exist, which state that a visa, residency, and work permit are required to remain in the United States, and that violators will be arrested and deported.
Chicago enforces other laws such as payment of property taxes and requirements to register one’s car, so why is it considered authoritarian to enforce immigration law?
Trump has warned that he may invoke the Insurrection Act if governors or mayors continue to resist federal authority. The law, rarely used since the 1992 Los Angeles riots, allows the president to deploy active-duty military personnel inside the United States to enforce federal law and restore order.
On October 6th, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson signed an executive order prohibiting federal immigration authorities, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), from using any city-owned or city-controlled property for civil immigration enforcement. The ban applies to all city lots, garages, and vacant spaces, including those belonging to Chicago Public Schools. It forbids federal agents from using these areas as staging or processing sites for immigration operations.
In response, the White House condemned the measure as “a disgusting betrayal of every law-abiding citizen.” By declaring city spaces as “ICE-free zones,” Johnson is protecting “criminal illegal alien predators” over the safety of Chicago families. Johnson defended his decision, insisting that if Congress would not check federal immigration enforcement, “then Chicago will.”
President Trump has said he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act if courts, governors, or mayors obstruct federal action to protect ICE agents or curb violent unrest. “If people were being killed, and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up—sure, I’d do that,” he said earlier this week. White House officials describe the process as “climbing an escalatory ladder,” emphasizing that all other options will be exhausted first.
The Insurrection Act has been used by presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson during the Civil Rights era to enforce desegregation orders when local authorities refused to act. Trump’s advisors, including Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, argue that the current wave of obstruction by Democratic officials meets the same threshold, an organized defiance of federal law.
The post Trump Considers Invoking Insurrection Act Against Lawless Governors and Mayors appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.